Examinando por Materia "Autonomía"
Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3
Resultados por página
Opciones de ordenación
Publicación Acceso abierto Consentimiento informado en la atención en psicología en Colombia. revisión del estado del arte (2010 - 2015)(Bogotá, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud, 2016) Navarrete, Miguel Angel; Alonso, Sandra Milena; Vargas Robles, Marta Teresa; Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la SaludInformed consent is linked to the principle of autonomy, being a key to perform interventions in health and research. In the field of psychology, informed consent has been a key to help the persons to get the right information and understanding that enable them to decide about their health or to agree to take part in research. To provide suitable information to patients, educational level, ability to understand and legal and sociocultural factors must be taken in account. Every person should be fully informed about the procedure which he/she is subject, explaining the benefits, risks, possible outcomes and alternatives. Some psychologist have reacted against the regulations of the informed consent made by COLPSIC in Colombia. Objective: Make a revision of the theory about informed consent to understand its development, characteristics and consequences of it in Psychology. Methods: A literature review in PubMed, Ebscoltost, Dialnet, Elsevier, Sciencie Direct, and Google Scholar databases; using the terms: Informed consent, psychology and patient autonomy. The selected articles had to be reviews or investigations in Latin America and more specifically in Colombia that is the focus country of this study. The articles had to be published in English or Spanish. Gray literature has been used and included in the bibliography section at the end of this text. Conclusion: The use of informed consent is regulated by ley 1090 of 2006. There has been a discussion about the use of a written document in psychology due to several difficulties profesionals ague not only in clinical attention but also in different psychology fields.Publicación Acceso abierto Gastrostomía endoscópica percutánea: ¿Es éticamente aceptable?(Asociación Colombiana de Gastroenterología, 2013-04-16) Peñaloza Ramírez, Arecio; Suárez Correa, Juliana; Blanco Rubio, Luis; Peñaloza Rosas, ArecioLa gastrostomía endoscópica percutánea se ha constituido en la técnica de elección. Sin embargo, por su fácil instauración, se utiliza en pacientes y circunstancias muy cuestionadas. Actualmente, por la tecnología que se ha desarrollado para mantener con vida a seres humanos, que años atrás habrían fallecido producto del curso natural de su enfermedad, es muy común el debate entre lo que se considera ordinario y extraordinario, en el cuidado de un paciente. Estas formas de vida, sostenidas por métodos artificiales, han sido cuestionadas e incluso consideradas indignas, por violar los principios básicos de autonomía y beneficencia de los pacientes. Con el desarrollo acelerado de la medicina, es necesario detenerse a pensar en las implicaciones éticas de nuestro quehacer diario, incluso antes de razonar técnicamentePublicación Acceso abierto El rol del psicólogo en relación a voluntades anticipadas y derecho a morir dignamente (Estado del arte)(Bogotá: Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud, 2016) Garzón Lara, Alexandra Carolina; Gómez Pineda, Stephanie; Ruiz Pava, JessicaFor a few years they have generated a series of judgments and values about the use and scope of advance directives against the right to die with dignity, medical staff and the interdisciplinary team involved in terminal chronic patients continues to be debated to respect their ethical and moral versus topic or follow a series of new ethical rules intended to do any harm to this and respect the final will of the patient so from there the concept of the role of psychologists related against the decision of a dignified death, taking into account regulatory changes and case law in Colombia. Objective: To determine the role of the psychologist regarding Advance Directives and the right to die with dignity. Method: The research includes documentary review of the concept and scope of the role of psychologists against living wills and the right to die with dignity. Data collection and use of information sources was made by the hermeneutical method for the analysis and interpretation of texts. Conclusions: The dialectic of life confronts us with the reality of their own and others death and the eventual decision in that context, it is important the attitude that takes a person or family facing a situation chronic health terminal; while there is some dichotomy and confrontation with what is desired and what is permitted or endorsed by the regulations. It should be noted that life and death change their meaning from one culture to another and are influenced by the beliefs of what is lived and felt in every moment of existence. The role of the psychologist is part of two key processes neutrality in the accompanying decision to reactions of the disease condition, and the grieving process that would guide and approach the subjectivism of advance or the right to die with dignity. Understanding the roles of psychologists fall into biopsychosocial interventions, decision making reactions to the disease, and intervention in the grieving process, providing comprehensive care of each subject and its key sickness.