Publicación:
Comparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesárea

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Laritzaspa
dc.contributor.authorMiranda, Angel Davidspa
dc.contributor.authorGonzález G., Hector A.spa
dc.date.accessioned2000-06-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-21T20:34:34Z
dc.date.available2000-06-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2022-02-21T20:34:34Z
dc.date.issued2000-06-01
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.identifier.doi10.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.229
dc.identifier.eissn2462-991X
dc.identifier.issn0121-7372
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.fucsalud.edu.co/handle/001/2144
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v9.n1.2000.229
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherSociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Hospital de San José y Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Saludspa
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/download/229/228
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2000 : Enero – Juniospa
dc.relation.citationendpage38
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage34
dc.relation.citationvolume9spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Repertorio de Medicina y Cirugíaspa
dc.relation.referencesCunningham, Mac Donald, Gant Leveno. William's Obstetrics; 41 edición. Masson S.A., Barcelona, España, 585 -90.spa
dc.relation.referencesHauth JC, Owen J. Transverse Uterine Incision Closure : One versus two layer. AmJ Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct; 167(4): 1108-11.spa
dc.relation.referencesFederici D, Lacelly B. Cesarean Section using the Misgay Ladach method. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997; 57(3): 273- 79.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlonso P Walker. Peritoneo Peritonitis y Abscesos Intraabdominales En: Schwars Principios de Cirugía General. Editorial MGH; 1303- 1307.spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis H & Reddle R. Does the Peritoneum to be closed at laparotomy. Brit J Surg, 1 1977; 164: 733-6.spa
dc.relation.referencesSanders, DiClementi. Principies of abdominal wound closure II. Prevention ofwounddehiscence. Arch Surg. 1997; 112(10): 1188-91.spa
dc.relation.referencesHull DB, Varner NW. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery, Obst Gynecol 1991; 77(6): 818- 21.spa
dc.relation.referencesPietrantoni M, -Parsons MT, O'Brien WF, Collins E, Knuppel RA, Spellacy WN. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77(2):293-6.spa
dc.relation.referencesNagele F, Karas H, Spitzer D, Staudach A, Karasegh S, Beck A, Husslein P. Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(4):1366-70.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcNally O. Does closure of the peritoneum duringZesarean section influence postoperative morbidity and subsequent bladder adhesion. J Obstet Gynecol, 1997.spa
dc.relation.referencesStark M. Technique of caesarean section: The Misgay Ladach method. Women's Health Today. XIV World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics at Montreal. September 1994. si - 85.spa
dc.relation.referencesHojberg KE, Aagaard J, Laursen H, Diab L, Secher NJ . Closure versus non -closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Evaluation of pain. A randomized study . Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77 ( 7): 741-5.spa
dc.relation.referencesChapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. One versus two-layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: (1)16-8.spa
dc.relation.referencesTucker JM, Hauth JC, Hodgins P, Owen J, Winkler JL. Trial of labor after a one or two layer closure of a low transverse uterine incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168(2): 545-6.spa
dc.relation.referencesObel J, Younis JS, Lang N, Levit A. Double-layer closure of uterine incision with visceral and parietal peritoneal closure: are they obligatory steps of routline cesarean sections? J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Nov-Dec; 5(6): 366-9.spa
dc.relation.referencesKaripineni RC, Wilk PJ, Danese CA. The role of the peritoneum in the healing of abdominal incisions. Surg Gyn Obstet. 1976; 142(5): 729-30.spa
dc.relation.referencesIrion O, Luzuy F, Beguin E Nonclosure of visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Jul; 103(7): 690-4.spa
dc.relation.referencesPridjian G, Hibbard JU, Moawad AH. Cesarean: Changing the trends. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 77(2): 195-200.spa
dc.rightsFundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud FUCS - 2018spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/229spa
dc.titleComparación de dos técnicas quirúrgicas de la cesáreaspa
dc.title.translatedComparison of two surgical techniques of caesarean sectioneng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dspace.entity.typePublication

Archivos

Colecciones

BA. Revista Repertorio